Long Island man was acquitted by a jury of sex crimes. You can guess Ahearn's reaction to the news

A high profile sex crime case in Suffolk County ends in acquittal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/02/nyregion/long-island-foster-father-not-guilty-abuse.html

His eyes wet, Cesar Gonzales-Mugaburu, a foster father who opened his Long Island home to scores of children with intellectual disabilities and mental illnesses, walked out of court here a free man on Tuesday after he was acquitted of endangering or sexually abusing boys in his care.

The verdict followed an emotional five-week trial in State Supreme Court that included testimony from eight accusers who had lived with Mr. Gonzales-Mugaburu, 60. It represented a stunning turnaround for him after more than a year in jail. And it dealt a blow to the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, which prosecuted the high-profile case that had raised questions about the child welfare system.

Donald Mates, Mr. Gonzales-Mugaburu’s lawyer, had argued that his client — so trusted that New York City’s child welfare agency had placed 95 boys in his care over two decades, many of whom he adopted — was a strict but not abusive foster parent who had looked after troubled boys. Mr. Mates raised doubt about the credibility of the accusers, arguing that they were coached, and questioned why a detective who had interviewed some of the boys did not testify — a point some jury members mentioned after delivering the verdict.

Mr. Mates said his client looked forward to getting “his good name back after it’s been smeared over the past year and a half.” Mr. Gonzales-Mugaburu stood beside him and nodded his head.

An ‘Exemplary’ Foster Father, a String of Suspicions and Sexual-Abuse Charges APRIL 1, 2016
“Cesar’s just, obviously, very happy, very emotional,” Mr. Mates said.

The jurors, who spent more than a week deliberating the 16 charges, said they struggled to stay impartial as they fought through the strong emotions stirred by the case. They used a white board to painstakingly account for the many details they were given and built a timeline. They debated the definition of “reasonable doubt” and had the judge redefine it for them.

Jury members fainted, experienced dizziness and stomach problems, and lost sleep, said Louise Corcoran, a juror who is a teacher from West Islip.

But in the end, they decided that Mr. Gonzales-Mugaburu was not guilty of any of the charges.

“We were, you know, waiting for the rest of the story,” Ms. Corcoran said. “It never came.”

Jurors had “to try to finish the story in your head, which you really can’t do,” she said.

Tim Carney, the jury foreman, who is a firefighter from Islip, also pointed to gaps in the case against Mr. Gonzales-Mugaburu. The prosecutors “just never built that bridge, in our eyes,” Mr. Carney said.

“We can’t ask for evidence to come in,” he said.

Laura Ahearn's reaction is as expected-- "The system failed us, and by the way we have a new stat we pulled out of our asses and we have a new program just for this type of case so bring money."

Where does this dubious claim of foster kids being 10 times more likely to be sexually abused originate? And if this was actually true, then why even have a foster care system?

Of course, Ahearn is already prepared to take MORE of your taxpayer money to fund another of her dubious programs. Who would have guessed?

This is now slander, Ahearn. Looks like you should be worried about getting sued yet again.

Hundreds "slip away" from New York registry list

The headline pisses me off but the news within is good. I bet ol' Laura Ahearn is beside herself. As usual, she sounds the fear alarm in hopes of getting the legislature to move the goalpost again.

http://www.bdtonline.com/cnhi_network/hundreds-slip-away-from-new-york-sex-offender-list/article_649f4a0c-6a29-5e58-a139-6de4fad0b7d3.html

Hundreds slip away from New York sex-offender list
By Joe Mahoney CNHI State Reporter Aug 12, 2016

More than 1,100 names have fallen off the New York sex offender registry this year, raising concerns among lawmakers and victims’ advocates that public safety is being jeopardized.

The names belong to low-level sex offenders who are only required to stay registered for 20 years. The Sex Offender Registration Act went into effect a little more than 20 years ago, on Jan. 21, 1996.

Lawmakers debated lengthening the requirement for those offenders to 30 years, as part of a bill that also would clamp new limits on places where sex offenders may live.

But a proposal that sailed through the New York state Senate with just five opposed was bottled up in an Assembly committee.

It has since become a front-burner issue for outnumbered Assembly Republicans, whose leader, Assemblyman Brian Kolb, R-Canandaigua, said a low-level assessment doesn’t always reflect the severity of the underlying crime.

“This is an area where we cannot afford any loopholes,” he said.

But at least one senator who voted against the bill, Sen. Gustavo Rivera, D-Bronx, said it would be unfair to hit offenders who “are not predators” with the same restrictions placed on more dangerous individuals.

“A Level One offender could be someone who on a prank grabbed a woman’s breast on public transportation,” he said. “While that’s obviously stupid, it’s not something that should take away your right to live somewhere or work somewhere for the rest of your life.”

New York’s sex offender registry includes 39,151 names. Of those, 14,575 are marked as Level One offenders.

The 14,117 offenders classified as Level Two — and the 9,685 listed at the highest tier, Level Three — are required to stay registered for life. As a result, they must update their home and work addresses with local police whenever they move.

The other 774 people on the list await assessments, which are set by judges at the time of sentencing and can vary for people convicted of the same crime.

Judges weigh factors such as whether crimes involved force, weapons and drugs; whether the victim was injured; and the victim’s age.

Advocates say dropping Level One offenders off the list — the registry has shed 1,159 so far this year — means employers and others trying to find information about those people won’t learn about their sex crimes.

Being dropped from the registry does not expunge someone’s record, but the state only shares criminal histories with limited types of employers, such as nursing homes and school districts.

“What’s most frightening is that a youth athletic league checking out applicants for coaching positions, or a mall hiring for an Easter Bunny, could end up taking on someone who is a convicted sex offender,” said Laura Ahearn, director of Parents for Megan’s Law and the Crime Victims Center, based in Ronkonkoma on Long Island.

Some Level One offenders committed rape and molested children, she said, and their status was negotiated as part of a plea deal when the registry was first structured.

Not all criminal justice experts agree with the push for stronger limits on sex offenders who’ve served their time.

“By making life difficult we actually increase, rather than decrease, the likelihood that they will commit another sex crime,” said Cynthia Calkins, a Buffalo-area native and psychology professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City.

Calkins said 95 percent of sex crimes in New York are committed by people not listed on registries. She questions the motive of “feel-good” legislation that won’t lead to better public protection.

“If we were serious about lowering rates of sexual violence, we ought to focus on developing strategies that might work,” she said, “like efforts that promote safety in the child’s own home, the place where abuse most often occurs.”

Terence Kindlon, a veteran criminal defense lawyer, said assessments of sex offenders have improved since the process began 20 years ago. Tightening limits on low-level sex offenders would be “draconian,” he added.

“There comes a time when the state just has to step away,” said Kindlon, who was recently named Albany County’s public defender.

The risk process has slowly become more flexible, “like a new shoe you’re breaking in,” he said, as court rulings have addressed concerns raised by prosecutors and defense lawyers.

For example, he said the statute already allows for those assessed as low-level offenders to be kept on the registry for life if their original crime was violent.

New York and other states created sex offender registries after the highly publicized murder of 7-year-old Megan Kanka in New Jersey in 1994. Her attacker was a convicted sex offender who lived across the street and lured her with the promise of showing her a puppy.

Justin Mason, spokesman for the state Division of Criminal Justice Services, said sex offenders removed from the list “have met their statutory requirement to register for 20 years.”

In each case, he said, the division has alerted the district attorney’s office that prosecuted the case and the police agency where the offender lives.

Joe Mahoney covers the New York Statehouse for CNHI’s newspapers and websites. Reach him at jmahoney@cnhi.com