This blog uncovers the corruption surrounding the Parents For Megan's Law (aka the "Crime Victim's Center") and its founder, Laura Ahearn. Also discusses Ahearn's close ties to the likes of disgraced politicians/ convicted criminals Dean Skelos, James Burke, and Thomas Spota. Because you can't have a "Crime Victim's Center" without CRIME. Original source material covered under Fair Use Law for investigative / educational purposes.
Wednesday, December 18, 2019
Another of Ahearn's political allies, Republican DA Thomas Spota, convicted for corruption, along with his "anti-corruption" assistant prosecutor
Another of Laura Ahearn's political stooges just got convicted.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/17/nyregion/tom-spota-trial-verdict.html
Scandal Began With Sex Toys. Now Ex-D.A. Is Convicted on Long Island.
The former official in Suffolk County was found guilty of conspiracy after a trial that exposed a culture of corruption.
By Nicole Hong and Arielle Dollinger
Dec. 17, 2019
Updated 5:41 p.m. ET
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. — He was one of the most powerful men on Long Island, serving as the top prosecutor in a suburban county with 1.5 million people. He won election after election for 15 years with bipartisan support.
But Thomas J. Spota, the district attorney in New York’s Suffolk County, had an Achilles’ heel.
He always had a soft spot for a police officer named James Burke, who rose under his tutelage to become the county’s chief of police. Mr. Spota viewed Mr. Burke almost as a son, standing with him whenever he was touched by scandal.
On Tuesday, Mr. Spota, 78, was convicted of participating in a yearslong conspiracy to cover up for Mr. Burke after he violently beat a man accused of stealing from him while he was the police chief.
The trouble started one morning in December 2012, when Chief Burke discovered somebody had broken into his police car. The thief took a duffel bag from the car that contained sex toys, a pornographic DVD and Viagra.
Later that morning, a man was arrested with the stolen goods. The chief barged into the police interrogation room where the man, handcuffed to the floor, called him a pervert. In a rage, Chief Burke kicked and punched him.
Mr. Spota set out to protect and defend Chief Burke, as he had before over a 40-year friendship, prosecutors said. That decision would cost Mr. Spota his career and turn him into a convicted criminal.
After hearing four weeks of trial testimony, a federal jury on Long Island found Mr. Spota guilty of four counts, including obstruction of justice and witness tampering. He was convicted along with Christopher McPartland, 53, who paradoxically had been Suffolk County’s top anticorruption prosecutor.
They each face up to 20 years in prison.
The convictions of Mr. Spota and Mr. McPartland “make it clear that the days of Long Island’s good old boy networks combining politics, power and policing to benefit a select few, at the expense of the taxpaying public, are dead and gone,” said Richard Donoghue, the United States attorney in the Eastern District of New York.
The jurors reached the guilty verdict after deliberating for about seven hours over two days.
Mr. Spota and Mr. McPartland sat without expression as the verdict was read. They hugged their lawyers afterward. Mr. Spota’s family members, seated in the first row of the courtroom, appeared emotional, with teary eyes and their arms around one another.
Mr. Spota’s lawyer, Alan Vinegrad, declined to comment on the verdict. Mr. McPartland’s lawyer, Larry H. Krantz, said, “There are many more legal steps in the case, and we will continue to fight for this.”
Mr. Burke, 55, had already pleaded guilty in 2016 to the assault and the subsequent cover-up, a year after resigning from the force. He completed his prison sentence this year but refused to testify at trial against his old colleagues.
The verdict was a hard-fought victory for the federal prosecutors and the F.B.I., whose investigation faced setbacks for years.
Proving obstruction of justice required the government to present evidence that the defendants acted with a corrupt purpose, a high legal bar. Without recordings of conversations, the trial hinged largely on the testimony of one witness: James Hickey, a former police commander who worked in Mr. Spota’s inner circle.
The cover-up of Chief Burke’s assault, witnesses at trial said, was part of a broader pattern. The testimony exposed an alarming culture of corruption and retribution in a county with about 2,500 police officers, one of the largest police departments in the United States.
Police officers who were supposed to investigate gangs and school shootings would be diverted to help their chief with petty vendettas and mundane tasks, like spying on his girlfriends or driving him to the airport, former officers testified.
Together, Mr. Spota, Mr. McPartland and Chief Burke controlled what amounted to a law-enforcement fiefdom in the eastern half of Long Island, prosecutors said.
The three men called themselves “the administration,” one former police officer testified. They golfed together and drank together. Mr. McPartland and Mr. Burke used to greet one another on the phone with a vulgar imprecation.
Mr. Burke’s relationship with Mr. Spota began in 1979, when Mr. Spota was a young prosecutor trying a murder case, and Mr. Burke, then a teenager, was his star witness.
Mr. Burke later became a police officer. In the 1990s, an internal investigation found that he had violated several police protocols, including having sex in his patrol car while in uniform with a prostitute who used crack cocaine. Mr. Spota, a lawyer for the police union at the time, defended Mr. Burke and negotiated a plea deal that saved his career.
Then in 2001, Mr. Spota, who switched parties from Republican to Democratic, was elected district attorney. He repeatedly promoted Mr. Burke in the Police Department, consolidating their power.
Prosecutors said the two of them, along with other officials, were able to punish people who challenged their authority.
In particular, Mr. Burke hated one of the police officials, Pat Cuff, who had conducted the internal investigation against him in the 1990s, witnesses said. When Mr. Cuff’s son was caught with a gun, the district attorney’s office threatened to upgrade the charges from a misdemeanor to a felony. Mr. Cuff cried at his desk, suspecting it was retaliation, a witness testified.
As soon as Mr. Burke became police chief in early 2012, he demoted Mr. Cuff by four ranks and assigned him to guard a warehouse.
The assault of the burglary suspect happened about a year into Mr. Burke’s tenure as police chief. The man in custody, Christopher Loeb, was a heroin user with a long criminal record. Chief Burke thought nobody would believe his word over the police chief’s, according to witness testimony.
Mr. Loeb was held on $500,000 bail, an unusually high amount for a car break-in. The case was assigned to the public corruption unit, led by Mr. McPartland, not the major crimes unit, where it would normally have been prosecuted.
But a few months later, in early 2013, Mr. Loeb’s lawyer publicly accused the police of assault, triggering a civil rights investigation.
The administration panicked, prosecutors said. Mr. McPartland helped concoct a cover story that Chief Burke had just “popped his head in” to the interrogation room. Three other police detectives had been in the room participating in the beating, and it was imperative that they all stuck to the same story.
To maintain the lie, Mr. Spota and Mr. McPartland relied heavily on Mr. Hickey, the police commander who supervised those three detectives.
Mr. Hickey testified that he was ordered to instruct his men to “deny, deny, deny.” Mr. Spota and the others involved in the cover-up handpicked one of the three officers, Anthony Leto, to lie under oath about the assault during a court hearing, Mr. Hickey said.
Mr. Leto told jurors that he feared if he were truthful, the police chief would falsely accuse his sons of a crime or plant drugs on them.
The obstruction initially worked, thwarting federal agents for several months. But the investigation escalated again in 2015 with more subpoenas.
During a meeting that year, Mr. McPartland speculated about who the “rat” was. Mr. Spota said that if one police officer cooperated, “He’ll never work here again and I will see to it,” according to Mr. Hickey’s testimony.
After the meeting, Chief Burke threatened that if the police detectives failed to stay in line, he would expose that Mr. Hickey was cheating on his wife, Mr. Hickey said.
“I realized that my career was over,” he testified, “and that if I even try to go to the feds at this point, I would be dead in Suffolk County.”
Mr. Hickey said that he stayed awake at night, feeling paranoid. He was hospitalized in a stress-induced delirium, and was screaming, biting and spitting, according to medical records shown at trial.
Four days after his release from the hospital in October 2015, he received a grand jury subpoena, he said.
Mr. Hickey decided to plead guilty to his role in the conspiracy and cooperated with prosecutors as their star witness, testifying on the stand for three days.
At trial, lawyers for Mr. McPartland and Mr. Spota tried to shred Mr. Hickey’s credibility, calling him a practiced liar and highlighting that he admitted to four extramarital affairs. They pointed to a state judge’s determination in 1990 that Mr. Hickey had lied under oath as a police officer in a different burglary case.
The defense said prosecutors were relying on Mr. Hickey’s recollection of conversations that happened years ago, with no concrete evidence to corroborate his memory. No other witness testified to receiving direct orders from Mr. Spota or Mr. McPartland to obstruct the investigation, defense lawyers argued.
Prosecutors produced calendar entries and call records that they said showed Mr. Hickey was telling the truth.
Ultimately, the 12 jurors chose to believe Mr. Hickey.
On Tuesday, after the verdict was read, Mr. Loeb, the man who was assaulted by the police chief, poked his head into the emptying courtroom. He had been watching the trial from the overflow room. He was smiling.
Saturday, October 5, 2019
Completing her plan to be the Lauren Book of the North, Laura Ahearn announces she is running for Senate
Why corrupt the Senate from the outside when you can corrupt it from within?
https://www.newsday.com/long-island/politics/laura-ahearn-kenneth-lavalle-senate-1.37066459?fbclid=IwAR3uP7qRJO_BdllwpIzc5Qv9FCuvi_Boic8Y9MtN57aZxd59KW_7nyIFALo
Democrat Laura Ahearn challenges GOP State Sen. Kenneth LaValle
By Michael Gormley
Updated October 1, 2019 7:07 PM
ALBANY — Democratic attorney and crime-victims advocate Laura Ahearn on Tuesday announced her campaign to take on State Sen. Kenneth LaValle (R-Port Jefferson), who has held his seat since 1977.
Ahearn's candidacy represents the first major effort by Democrats to pick up another Long Island Senate seat in 2020. Democrats won the Senate majority in the last legislative elections in 2018, and have a 40-22 seat majority, with one vacancy.
“I’m an attorney, a social worker and a mom,” said Ahearn, executive director of Ronkonkoma-based Parents for Megan's Law and the Crime Victim’s Center, a nonprofit victim's rights organization.
“For 25 years, I have fought to keep Suffolk County residents and children safe from sexual predators," she said in her announcement. She said she founded the Crime Victims Center "from a room in my home and built it to become a nationally recognized, powerful force with nearly 30 full-time staffers who protect and educate our most vulnerable and provide help to children and adults who were victimized.”
LaValle was the longtime chairman of the Senate Higher Education Committee before Democrats won the Senate majority.
LaValle, who represents the 1st District, said he approaches "every election the same way; I stand on my continuous record of accomplishments and years of service to our communities.”
In his latest financial filings with state Board of Elections, LaValle had $114,050 on hand as of July.
Ahearn hasn’t yet had to disclose her fundraising and spending.
In 2018, LaValle got 71,015 votes to Democrat Greg Fisher's 53,790. LaValle had beaten Fisher by a wider margin in 2016.
The 1st District may be one of the battleground races in 2020.
The district has 75,470 enrolled Democratic voters and 76,907 Republicans, although the GOP’s strength is boosted by 5,315 enrolled Conservative Party voters.
Republican President Donald Trump won Suffolk County in 2016 over Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Since the November 2018 legislative elections, the 1st District has gained 1,623 Democratic voters, 210 Republicans and 51 Conservatives, according to state records.
Senate Democrats this year passed the Child Victims Act that allows victims of childhood sexual assault to sue abusers for acts committed as long as decades ago.
The former Senate Republican majority had blocked the measure for years, arguing it could bankrupt religious organizations and schools found to have protected or shielded abusers.
https://www.newsday.com/long-island/politics/laura-ahearn-kenneth-lavalle-senate-1.37066459?fbclid=IwAR3uP7qRJO_BdllwpIzc5Qv9FCuvi_Boic8Y9MtN57aZxd59KW_7nyIFALo
Democrat Laura Ahearn challenges GOP State Sen. Kenneth LaValle
By Michael Gormley
Updated October 1, 2019 7:07 PM
ALBANY — Democratic attorney and crime-victims advocate Laura Ahearn on Tuesday announced her campaign to take on State Sen. Kenneth LaValle (R-Port Jefferson), who has held his seat since 1977.
Ahearn's candidacy represents the first major effort by Democrats to pick up another Long Island Senate seat in 2020. Democrats won the Senate majority in the last legislative elections in 2018, and have a 40-22 seat majority, with one vacancy.
“I’m an attorney, a social worker and a mom,” said Ahearn, executive director of Ronkonkoma-based Parents for Megan's Law and the Crime Victim’s Center, a nonprofit victim's rights organization.
“For 25 years, I have fought to keep Suffolk County residents and children safe from sexual predators," she said in her announcement. She said she founded the Crime Victims Center "from a room in my home and built it to become a nationally recognized, powerful force with nearly 30 full-time staffers who protect and educate our most vulnerable and provide help to children and adults who were victimized.”
LaValle was the longtime chairman of the Senate Higher Education Committee before Democrats won the Senate majority.
LaValle, who represents the 1st District, said he approaches "every election the same way; I stand on my continuous record of accomplishments and years of service to our communities.”
In his latest financial filings with state Board of Elections, LaValle had $114,050 on hand as of July.
Ahearn hasn’t yet had to disclose her fundraising and spending.
In 2018, LaValle got 71,015 votes to Democrat Greg Fisher's 53,790. LaValle had beaten Fisher by a wider margin in 2016.
The 1st District may be one of the battleground races in 2020.
The district has 75,470 enrolled Democratic voters and 76,907 Republicans, although the GOP’s strength is boosted by 5,315 enrolled Conservative Party voters.
Republican President Donald Trump won Suffolk County in 2016 over Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Since the November 2018 legislative elections, the 1st District has gained 1,623 Democratic voters, 210 Republicans and 51 Conservatives, according to state records.
Senate Democrats this year passed the Child Victims Act that allows victims of childhood sexual assault to sue abusers for acts committed as long as decades ago.
The former Senate Republican majority had blocked the measure for years, arguing it could bankrupt religious organizations and schools found to have protected or shielded abusers.
Thursday, September 5, 2019
US Second Circuit Court decides that it is OK for PFML to harass registered citizens
This is good news for vigilantes and other terrorist groups but bad news for people who have served their sentences and are trying to reintegrate into society. For now, at least, the enemy gets to gloat.
There are still other ways PFML can be sued for engaging in state-sponsored harassment.
https://www.courthousenews.com/second-circuit-backs-home-checks-for-sex-offenders/
Second Circuit Backs Home Checks for Sex Offenders
September 4, 2019AMANDA OTTAWAY
MANHATTAN (CN) – A Long Island sex offender who faced home visits from a private nonprofit contracted by his county did not endure an unconstitution al search, the Second Circuit affirmed Wednesday.
Writing for a three-judge panel, U.S. Circuit Judge Christopher Droney noted in the ruling that in this case, public-safety interests outweigh the offenders’ rights.
“In sum, the program advances the government’s substantial interest in reducing sex offender recidivism by improving the accuracy of the registry,” the 29-page opinion states. “Thus, the program serves a special need ‘beyond the normal need for law enforcement.’”
A man who served four years in prison on a 1992 rape and sodomy conviction brought the underlying lawsuit under the pseudonym John Jones. Because of his status as a level-one offender — a designation for those deemed to pose a moderate risk of reoffending — Jones faced a 20-year requirement to register annually with the state, visit his local police precinct to get photographed every three years, and tell authorities if he moves.
Because Jones lives in Suffolk County, however, he has also faced additional requirements since 2013 under the Community Protection Act, a local law that established a three-year contract with the nonprofit Parents of Megan’s Law to track and monitor registered sex offenders pursuant to a contract with police.
The group reported a 99% response rate from registrants at the end of the first year and found 13% of home addresses on the registry conflicted with the person’s actual address.
Jones sued after receiving two home visits from the field representative s, saying the threat of embarrassment from such visits made him stop going to his children’s school and athletic activities.
The Fourth Amendment only prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, but a federal judge ruled against Jones’ case at summary judgment. Affirming that result Wednesday, the Obama-appointed Droney found the visits constitutional under the special needs doctrine.
Pointing to the 1999 ruling Roe v. Marcotte, Droney noted that the same logic allowed the court to upheld a Connecticut law that required incarcerated sex offenders to submit DNA samples to a data bank.
“We held that program served the government’s significant interest in solving past and future crimes, and deterring sex offenders from reoffending in the future,” Droney wrote.
The ruling also says Megan’s Law visits did not significantly affect Jones’ freedom.
“The detention was brief and unobtrusive,” Droney wrote. “The address verification process lasted mere minutes, and the RVRs [Registry Verification Field Representative s] did not request information other than Jones’s address and did not touch him or treat him in a threatening or rude manner.”
Droney added that certain groups of people, such as registered sex offenders, “‘enjoy a diminished expectation of privacy’ in certain information.” Jones had also received advance notice he needed to provide his home address.
Jones was removed from the registry in 2016 after serving the required 20 years.
Link to full decision--
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/jones-ca2.pdf
There are still other ways PFML can be sued for engaging in state-sponsored harassment.
https://www.courthousenews.com/second-circuit-backs-home-checks-for-sex-offenders/
Second Circuit Backs Home Checks for Sex Offenders
September 4, 2019AMANDA OTTAWAY
MANHATTAN (CN) – A Long Island sex offender who faced home visits from a private nonprofit contracted by his county did not endure an unconstitution al search, the Second Circuit affirmed Wednesday.
Writing for a three-judge panel, U.S. Circuit Judge Christopher Droney noted in the ruling that in this case, public-safety interests outweigh the offenders’ rights.
“In sum, the program advances the government’s substantial interest in reducing sex offender recidivism by improving the accuracy of the registry,” the 29-page opinion states. “Thus, the program serves a special need ‘beyond the normal need for law enforcement.’”
A man who served four years in prison on a 1992 rape and sodomy conviction brought the underlying lawsuit under the pseudonym John Jones. Because of his status as a level-one offender — a designation for those deemed to pose a moderate risk of reoffending — Jones faced a 20-year requirement to register annually with the state, visit his local police precinct to get photographed every three years, and tell authorities if he moves.
Because Jones lives in Suffolk County, however, he has also faced additional requirements since 2013 under the Community Protection Act, a local law that established a three-year contract with the nonprofit Parents of Megan’s Law to track and monitor registered sex offenders pursuant to a contract with police.
The group reported a 99% response rate from registrants at the end of the first year and found 13% of home addresses on the registry conflicted with the person’s actual address.
Jones sued after receiving two home visits from the field representative s, saying the threat of embarrassment from such visits made him stop going to his children’s school and athletic activities.
The Fourth Amendment only prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, but a federal judge ruled against Jones’ case at summary judgment. Affirming that result Wednesday, the Obama-appointed Droney found the visits constitutional under the special needs doctrine.
Pointing to the 1999 ruling Roe v. Marcotte, Droney noted that the same logic allowed the court to upheld a Connecticut law that required incarcerated sex offenders to submit DNA samples to a data bank.
“We held that program served the government’s significant interest in solving past and future crimes, and deterring sex offenders from reoffending in the future,” Droney wrote.
The ruling also says Megan’s Law visits did not significantly affect Jones’ freedom.
“The detention was brief and unobtrusive,” Droney wrote. “The address verification process lasted mere minutes, and the RVRs [Registry Verification Field Representative s] did not request information other than Jones’s address and did not touch him or treat him in a threatening or rude manner.”
Droney added that certain groups of people, such as registered sex offenders, “‘enjoy a diminished expectation of privacy’ in certain information.” Jones had also received advance notice he needed to provide his home address.
Jones was removed from the registry in 2016 after serving the required 20 years.
Link to full decision--
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/jones-ca2.pdf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)